Back to blog

Personalized Advertising, Ad-Blockers, And How Publishers Can Better Handle Both

By Mark McCormickApril 7, 20254 min read
Personalized Advertising, Ad-Blockers, And How Publishers Can Better Handle Both

Never miss a post

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox.

Publishers are all too familiar with the rock, the hard place, and the struggles of being caught between both.

The rise of ad-blockers has presented one such unwelcoming surface, and a new YouGov study has examined the relationship between that technology and ad personalization.

The “Ad-Verse Reactions” report found that more than half of the Americans surveyed (54%) are creeped out by personalized ads, with 44% of those creeped out taking action by running an ad blocker at all times, no matter what site they visit.

It’s a “situation that should alarm publishers … not to mention advertisers,” according to MediaPost’s Ray Schultz, though the report’s alarm bell doesn’t come without some insights to be gleaned and takeaways to consider.

(Photo Source: YouGov)

Ads based on browsing history were considered the most invasive type of personalized advertising (for 59% of those surveyed), followed by ads based on social media behavior (48%) and ads based on purchasing history (42%). Of the actions that would make them more comfortable with personalized ads, 52% said opt-out options, 35% said minimal data collection, 33% said clear privacy policies, and 30% said ads that used anonymized data.

“1 in 4 Americans agree that personalized advertising is helpful for discovering new products that they may want to buy,” the study says, with that number rising to 30% for Gen Z and Millennials. “However, Americans are less likely to find personalized advertising helpful compared to all other surveyed regions across the world.”

Subscribe for more like this

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox.